Saturday, December 03, 2005

New dynasty

I’ll post an ascention address tomorrow, when I get all my thoughts in line.  Until then, I’ll be fiddling with colour schema and graphics and so on, and coming up with that all-important first proposal.

In the upcoming dynasty, I encourage the following:
1) Rules that contradict each other
2) Rules that allow modificaiton of the rules via methods other than proposal
3) Paradox

I hope this dynasty to be played mostly in the ruleset, with some GNDT goodness as well.

Cool?

Comments

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 19:19:58 UTC

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

3.14159265

Rodney:

03-12-2005 19:20:43 UTC

We should also get that CFJ/Hiatus system fixed, as it needs fixing.

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 19:28:31 UTC

Yep.  Feel free :)

Quazie:

03-12-2005 19:31:36 UTC

time to rock the socks off of everyone!  hooza!  the sooner you ascend the better, also just so we know, are we keeping the other or getting rid of it?

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 20:04:34 UTC

All the rules are going to get canned.

Quazie:

03-12-2005 20:40:43 UTC

poo, fine

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 20:57:33 UTC

Heh.  sorry?

smith:

03-12-2005 21:30:54 UTC

Contradictory rules? That doesn’t sound so good. Unless there is a priority system, it would just be fodder for argument.

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 21:38:06 UTC

*ding*

I’ve got plans for that.  And the contradictions even make sense, thematically.

Excalabur:

03-12-2005 21:46:48 UTC

veto