Sunday, April 30, 2017

Call for Judgment: No clones

Times out 1-4. Failed by pokes.

Adminned at 02 May 2017 23:35:45 UTC

Under Gameplay, change “Let the power of team A be represented by X and the power of team B be represented by Y.” to

Let the power of team A be represented by X and the power of team B be represented by Y. Team A cannot be the same team as team B and vice versa.

When this CfJ is enacted if during the time this proposal was pending a team has played any games against themselves, reduce that Manager’s cash by the amount they earned by playing games against themselves.
If there are a quorum of valid FOR votes (not including the author’s vote) that contain “reduce beam”, also reduce Cuddlebeam’s cash by the amount they earned for playing their first game against themselves and reduce Cuddlebeam’s games played by 1.



04-30-2017 17:00:25 UTC

Don’t be cheeky now lol.

Include to also cancel the game you’ve just played against me, which has benefited from me having a team with super low Power.


04-30-2017 17:16:44 UTC

against I don’t want to undo Cuddlebeam’s game, and the change to the Ruleset is more of a proposal.


04-30-2017 17:20:37 UTC



04-30-2017 17:25:01 UTC

Well I thought that even though it’s a change to the ruleset, it’s important to implement quickly, since anyone with a full team could simply play a bunch of games against themselves.

CfJ state in their definition “if a Manager feels that an aspect of the game needs urgent attention”

[Cuddlebeam] I don’t believe that was against the rules but if you feel that I interpreted something wrongly, then make a CfJ yourself.


04-30-2017 17:47:09 UTC

I wouldn’t have been opposed to voting for just the ruleset change but we’re currently not in danger of a bunch of self-games; all of the full teams have used their biweekly game.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:

04-30-2017 18:08:18 UTC

against pokes, the self-games take advantage of the unlimited games because both managers consent.


05-01-2017 04:17:31 UTC

[PS] The consenting action will allow someone to play 11 games against themselves per week, not unlimited. I guess I was just a little paranoid, at this state it’s more appropriate as a proposal. A CfJ would probably be more appropriate if more people had full teams.


05-01-2017 09:19:50 UTC


Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:

05-01-2017 09:45:47 UTC

card, no it wouldn’t because it would put them more than 3 games ahead.


05-02-2017 15:59:08 UTC



05-02-2017 15:59:28 UTC

fuck I though I hadn’t voted on this lol, sorry