Proposal: No Disguising The Past
Timed out 7-2 with 3 DEFs. Enacted by card.
Adminned at 20 Jun 2017 15:29:37 UTC
If the Expedition Leader does not have a valid FOR vote on this proposal, it does nothing instead.
Make a new rule “Unmasked” with the text:
After a DoV or DoA has passed the Expedition Leader makes an “Unmasked” post in a timely manner containing the following information:
The backgrounds of each Explorer along with the date and time they received those backgrounds.
If an Explorer used a secret power (such as the spy’s power), include what time and date they used it at and what information they received from using such a power.
Comments
Cuddlebeam:
Cpt_Koen:
Kevan:
Sinq:
Cuddlebeam:
“If the Expedition Leader does not have a valid FOR vote on this proposal, it does nothing instead.”-> the ELeader could just Veto if they can’t do this anyways without that clause but tomahtos tomatoes.
card:
Yeah but if the Expedition Leader doesn’t vote at all we don’t want to give them extra work.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
orkboi:
Cuddlebeam:
@card: ah, true
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
But, what if they wish to not comment, i.e. security council’s difference between veto and against.
Cuddlebeam:
@PSS: If Sphinx doesn’t comment then nothing at all happens, that’s the trick.
pokes:
card:
So is anyone going to propose something else, or are we done with this dynasty?
Weekends don’t usually seem to bring this much of a hiccup in proposals.
Kevan:
Might be that people were waiting for the new week’s Hints to be posted, after a week with two or more successful Conspiracies.
I’m a bit worried that the “Cthulhu rises, nobody wins!” Cultist mechanic means that there’s actually not much incentive for individual Cultists to try and win (or do anything at all). And that since it looks easier for Cultists to coordinate than for Scholars, Cultists are likely to increase in number.
pokes:
CoV
Sphinx:
I think I tracked everything important for this proposal.