Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Proposal: Not so fungible

Timed out and passed, 7-1. Josh

Adminned at 01 Jun 2012 04:46:53 UTC

Add the following to the end of the second paragraph of the sub-rule entitled “Victory”:

Any other pending Declarations of Victory for a dynasty fail if a Declaration of Victory for that dynasty is passed. A Time Monk may only Declare Victory in a Dynasty they are currently occupying. If a Time Monk ever has a pending Declaration of Victory in a dynasty that they are not currently occupying then it may not be enacted, and may be failed by any admin.

Those last two posts courtesy of Clucky and Bucky.

posted by Josh at 30 May 2012 11:23:52 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

Purplebeard:

30-05-2012 14:36:59 UTC

for

Kevan: City he/him

30-05-2012 14:46:22 UTC

for

Yonah:

30-05-2012 14:57:21 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

30-05-2012 15:24:34 UTC

Does this work?

“When a DoV is enacted, all other active DoVs are failed, and a new Dynasty begins with the Time Monk who made the DoV as its Time Buddha.”

note that you don’t need to “achieve victory” for a DoV to pass. You also don’t need it for a DoV to be created. I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that if your DoV for Dynasty 33 passes, then that DoV was enacted so all other active DoVs are failed and a new Dynasty begins.

Darknight: he/him

30-05-2012 17:06:05 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

30-05-2012 17:16:26 UTC

for

Bucky:

30-05-2012 17:31:50 UTC

against , because it will cause extreme annoyance if there is ever a way to change another Monk’s Dynasty (e.g. while they have a pending DoV).  There is a dynastic rule from a past Dynasty that would Permit such a tactic.

moonroof:

31-05-2012 14:40:58 UTC

for