Saturday, February 14, 2009

Call for Judgment: Oh, no! Not again!

High Command understands that some Soldiers have no Loyalty whatsoever, but are also not Disloyal. A definition error has been rectified that suggested this was impossible and would cause a rip in the space-time continuum.

Reporting, Devenger.

(Passed 12-1. Note that people do not auto-FOR their own CfJs.)

Adminned at 15 Feb 2009 05:16:42 UTC

The Ruleset currently has the following sentences right next to each other:

Each Soldier has a numeric statistic Loyalty that is tracked in the GNDT, and can be any positive or negative whole number.  The default for this statistic is 0.

I am not making this up.

When this CfJ passes:

Replace the text “any positive or negative whole number” in the rule “Loyalty” with the text “any integer”.  Change the Gamestate to what it would be if that replacement of ruletext had been made at the same time the rule “Loyalty” came into existence, and if each non-General Soldier’s initial amount of Loyalty had been 0.

Comments

Amnistar: he/him

14-02-2009 22:04:26 UTC

for

ais523:

14-02-2009 22:05:44 UTC

for Clearly we will have to increase the levels of numeracy among our Soldiers still further…

Devenger:

14-02-2009 22:10:50 UTC

for I expect humorous flavour text for this CfJ admining though.

Hix:

14-02-2009 22:11:16 UTC

for , but I joined the Klatchian Foreign Legion so that I could forget about all this mathy nonsense.

Klisz:

14-02-2009 22:15:57 UTC

for ... I don’t see what’s wrong with it, though.

Sparrow:

14-02-2009 22:17:36 UTC

It says positive or negative whole number, which doesn’t include 0.

Sparrow:

14-02-2009 22:18:46 UTC

(even though the default is 0)

Klisz:

14-02-2009 22:34:32 UTC

Ah.

Kevan: he/him

14-02-2009 22:49:44 UTC

for

Gnauga:

15-02-2009 00:09:56 UTC

for BAAAHAHAHAHAHA. Again?

Rodlen:

15-02-2009 00:41:50 UTC

for

Elias IX:

15-02-2009 00:45:25 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

15-02-2009 02:25:00 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

15-02-2009 02:31:46 UTC

for

Rodlen:

15-02-2009 02:44:38 UTC

...Arth!?!

Darknight: he/him

15-02-2009 04:59:34 UTC

for Art… the odd duck out lol

Igthorn:

15-02-2009 09:32:37 UTC

for

Gnauga:

15-02-2009 12:52:18 UTC

Just for kicks.