Thursday, August 05, 2010

Proposal: Old Man and the Sea

Procedurally Vetoed. - lilomar

Adminned at 06 Aug 2010 13:38:56 UTC

Enact a new GREEN Dynastic Rule, entitled “We’re Completely Sane Here”, with the following text:

There exists an item called the Left Hand, which must have exactly one owner. Ownership of the Left Hand is indicated by appending the letter L to its owner’s Treason value in the GDNT.

Whenever a Citizen is terminated, that player becomes the owner of the Left Hand.

Because it is traitorous, the Citizen owning the Left Hand cannot vote AGAINST a proposal (though they can of course vote DEFERENTIAL, allowing the infinite wisdom of the High-Programmer to prevail). If that Citizen does so, any Citizen or Officer can Demote him one Clearance level if no one has done so already.

Comments

scshunt:

05-08-2010 23:18:00 UTC

This is also TREASON.

glopso:

05-08-2010 23:38:21 UTC

against  what the hell is the GDNT?

Klisz:

05-08-2010 23:38:37 UTC

against  against  against  against  against Players should not be restricted from voting on proposals to change the core rules.

glopso:

05-08-2010 23:41:29 UTC

And it’s also impossible to record anything in the gdnt.

Klisz:

05-08-2010 23:49:48 UTC

glopso: That’s a typo, and can be fixed by any admin.

redtara: they/them

06-08-2010 00:06:33 UTC

for

Kyre:

06-08-2010 00:40:32 UTC

against Per Darth. If you had an exception for proposals that affect only the core rules then I’d like this rule.

Kevan: he/him

06-08-2010 09:39:10 UTC

against Also, you’re saying that this player cannot vote, then defining what happens if they do.

Keba:

06-08-2010 12:33:58 UTC

against

lilomar:

06-08-2010 13:45:57 UTC

against per ^

Yet another situation where a definition of a Core Proposal and Dynastic Proposal would be useful.

lilomar:

06-08-2010 14:15:10 UTC

This proposal violates COC Directive ONLYCT. You have been given one Treason Point.

Purplebeard:

06-08-2010 14:55:15 UTC

against

Bucky:

06-08-2010 20:16:10 UTC

against

ais523:

06-08-2010 20:23:07 UTC

against

scshunt:

06-08-2010 20:26:38 UTC

against

lilomar:

06-08-2010 20:38:31 UTC

procedural veto per s/k above.