Proposal: Outfield
Times out and fails 2-6. -RaichuKFM
Adminned at 21 Feb 2013 17:40:23 UTC
If there exists a rule entitled “Complicationsâ€, change its text to read:
No rule may specify a victory condition that cannot possibly ever be achieved by any Honourable Member; any proposal that seeks to enact such a rule may be marked as illegal at any time by an admin.
If there does not exist a rule entitled “Complicationsâ€, enact a new rule entitled “Complications†with the above text.
Not just about names. Every Honourable Members should theoretically be able to, at some point, achieve the victory condition.
(Incorrectly Adminned by RaichuKFM and near-immediately fixed. Old admin text: Can’t be enacted and fails 2-7. -RaichuKFM)
“Cannot possibly ever” doesn’t mean much when we can change the game pretty much whenever and however we please through proposals. Even something like “The Honourable Member called Purplebeard has achieved victory” could easily apply to anyone after two name-changes.
Because we’re preserving “Over 9000”.
Skju:
I didn’t want to worry about Deliberations passing and so forth.