Saturday, January 29, 2022

Proposal: Overtime Fix

Timed out and enacted, 2 votes to 1. Josh

Adminned at 31 Jan 2022 16:32:33 UTC

In the sentence, “If an Employee does not share a Department with any Employee whose name is mentioned in a given Promotion Proposal or a Demotion Proposal, then their vote on that Proposal is invalid.” change “or a Demotion Proposal” to “or a given Demotion Proposal”.

Things broke, and someone had to fix them in time for Monday. In this case, Clucky claimed he was able to vote against my Department’s Proposals because of the missing word “given”, and the fact that he shared a Department with at least one person on *any* Demotion Proposal.

posted by TyGuy6 at 29 Jan 2022 07:59:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

29-01-2022 08:07:38 UTC

Would be useful to use this to correctly apply the affects of the impacted proposals?

Clucky: he/him

29-01-2022 08:20:36 UTC

i think its a cute bug and yeah its fine to fix but retroactively effecting impacted proposals i’m not even sure how that would work and also why?

TyGuy6:

29-01-2022 08:28:55 UTC

I’m not going to undo a decent scam in that way. (And I’m sorry, Josh, but apparently Clucky doesn’t want to see you demoted.)

Josh: Observer he/they

29-01-2022 08:30:12 UTC

🙄

Be more subtle, you two

Clucky: he/him

29-01-2022 08:30:21 UTC

josh was a good VP in sales! hard worker! I liked working for him! was sad to see him go but from what I can see he’s working just as hard on his new team so would be silly to demote him!

Josh: Observer he/they

29-01-2022 11:44:31 UTC

against

Zack: he/him

29-01-2022 13:51:24 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

29-01-2022 19:47:06 UTC

for

Zack: he/him

29-01-2022 19:49:32 UTC

imperial Cov