- this isn’t particularly important.

I want to be able to legally say “Subrincinator Torments Ed,” and not have the action be disqualified because I conjugated the verb.

-insert Python joke here-

This is ridiculous.  “Torments,” “Tormenting,” “Tormented” and “Tormenter” all include the word “Torment.”  If somebody tries to disqualify you for it—which they won’t—then CfJ.

I don’t think it sets good precedence to have words inside of words count.

List of words in the previous sentence, to illustrate:

I, don’t, think, it, sets, good, precedence, to, have, words, inside, of, words, count, do, on, hi, in, ink, it, set, go, goo, precede, recede, cede, eden, den, ha, ave, word, side.

How many of those are capitalized?

The problem is, if the proposal “Loosen Up” is accepted, this proposal will have no effet, since the text it will try to change will not exist anymore.

And I think that if I want to personalize my uplifting or tormenting comment, I will just include the word “Uplift” of “Torment” in parenthesis.

As Brendan has posted a Meddling comment with an inflected form of the word “Uplift,” and his action has not been contested, I understand this proposal to be superfluous.  It’s already lost, but I’ll go ahead and self-kill anyhow.