Wow, This appears:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/blognomic/www/ee/system/core/core.functions.php(634) : eval()‘d code on line 97

Uhm, does this mean I win?

Anyhoozit, I tried to post this:

According to “The Director of Operations may be Telephoned by emailing .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). The Director of Operations may also be referred to as “D-Ops” in rule 2.1

Replace in Rule 2.3 “Any Agent who does not have a Codename may Telephone the Director of Operations to request an identity.” with

Any Agent who does not have a Codename may make a telephone call to the D-Ops through the use of the Red Phone to request an identity.

In the Flavour Text: Because it wasn’t clear if it was .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or the Red Phone email adress

Odd, it looks like it was caused - and can be replicated - by having an email address in the flavour text field. I’ve edited spaces into it to stop it happening.

The proposal had also been timestamped 07:14:48 UTC, which may have been Bucky trying something out to fix the problem? I’ve bumped it back to what I assume the correct timestamp should have been.

, anyway. The ruleset says “The Director of Operations may be Telephoned by [doing this thing]”, so it’s unambiguous when we say that someone “may Telephone the Director of Operations”. There’s nothing else it could mean.

Though I do want to ask if a Procedural veto is in order for either of ujalu’s proposals, since he’s still learning the ropes.

Only needs a normal veto, since it’s next in the queue.