Not because it isn’t a good idea, it is, but because it is very similiar to the game mechanic that ran the game last time.  I’d like for wage increases to be less dependent on proposals.  I have an idea that I’ll put forward when I clean up the Machine aspects.

Thats understandable, though it isn’t a wage increase its a one time monetary bonus. It goes to Net Worth not salary.

But it is similar, nonetheless

I think it’s got good flavor, and is far enough away from DNA points that it won’t seem too similar.

I think it makes sense, Dynastically. And like, other than the fact that its “getting stuff for how you vote” it is very different from last game. I would be against anything like “Bonus for writing proposal with lots of FOR votes”, but respecting the corporate structure and getting money for it makes sense, no?

I think it’s different enough flavor wise to be okay.  However, I’m not sure if $1 per vote is going to be enough to swing things one way or the other, so I’ll leave it up to our CEO to decide whether e wants sycophants surrounding him or not.

I like the YESMAN incentive flavorwise, but it’s infinite as written:

I vote DEF on a proposal.  Voting on the proposal ends.  I increase my net worth by $1.  But the trigger in the ruleset is still true, so I can do it again.  (also, there’s nothing saying the proposal in question has to be a recent proposal, so even without abusing the infinite nature of this rule, I could get quite a headstart from all the times I voted DEF in previous dynasties)

I would reccomend language along the lines of “when voting ends on a proposal, each Worker who voted DEFERENTIAL on that proposal may, once and only once within the next 72 hours, increase eir own NW by $1.”

To discourage last-minute changes of vote just to get the reward (which also tends to give an advantage to admins), I would prefer that the reward only goes to a Worker whose ONLY vote on a proposal was DEFERENTIAL, and only to the first Quorum of Workers who make such a vote.

Very good point Hix.