if a proposal were to exist that said
only a fred supporter may win and this sentence takes priority over all other sentences. only an angel supporter may win and this sentence takes priority over all other sentences.
what would the implications be?
the real question is what is the heiarchy of sentences within a rule
so the sandbox says that fred supporters can’t whisper but all people without that M word must whisper to Excalbur. I am uber-ich so i must abide by both of those things at the same time as i am a fred supporter… what do i do?
Someone will have to fix this through proposal, but until then… i don’t think that a quick fix is possible.
Like some quantum physicist’s inner voice, you must whisper and not whisper at the same time.
Hm. I’ll see what I can do.
And be nice to us quantum physics types…
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Cayvie:
i think the implication would be that nobody could win who was not a fred and angel supporter.
sentences within a proposal have the same priority.