Though I still think it would have been neat to play a game with this many people.

I think it would have been neat to play a game this many actual players

Notice: Undefined variable: cfjcount in /home/blognomic/www/ee/system/core/core.functions.php(634) : eval()‘d code on line 50

I agree with southpointingchariot.

Also, I see the same error as Roujo.

Whoa this game moves too fast for me to keep up

Although I think your DEF clause shoots itself in the foot by going on to say that such votes will “have no effect whatsoever except to void earlier voting icons”.

Although if open proposals can specify how to count votes on them, I have a great scam where I make a proposal on which AGAINST votes count as FOR votes.

[Roujo] Looks like Darth edited the sidebar to list the number of CfJs (the title was previously just “Pending Calls for Judgement”), a couple of days ago, but didn’t copy the bit of code that handles zero. Fixed.

[ais523] They can’t specify how to count votes on them. But they can specify effects contingent on those votes, other than passing or failing itself.

[Kevan] The intention is to honour the DEFs in the first Proposal, not on this one.

Dislike the idea that people have to post on specific proposals to not be de-idled. This game is running really fast at the moment. Just because people don’t follow it for a couple of days is no reason to idle them.

I suppose.

[Anduril] That’s why I’ve referred to two old posts also. That will give us a good cut on whoever is really voting.

  to keep it from qouruming before the 48 hours pass.

People have had plenty of time to vote on these three proposals. I think we should be less concerned about getting a quorum too soon.

On top of that, if anyone does get idled improperly, it’s easy to re-idle them.

I agree with the idea that it’s a little annoying to have to vote in order not to be idled, but there’s no longer a glut in the queue, so finding this post in 48 hours shouldn’t be too difficult, and even so there aren’t any adverse gamestate consequences that would come of being idled right now.

ping.

Seems like a good plan to me.

By my count, Agora Nomic, Blorg, CWW, digibomber, dupdog, Elias IX, lass, Libby, rebelyellow, Schrodinger’s Cat, Tavros Nitram, Winner, and Yally will be idled.

Oh, and Phatom Hoover

Brought up in IRC: The fact that we are not, in fact, certain of who validly voted on those proposals.

Yup…

Oh right, CoV for that reason.

CoV

CoV per IRC. This depends on pre-ratification gamestate via validity of votes. (For example, would Ely have been idled by this if they hadn’t voted on it?) It seems silly to reintroduce ambiguity, given how much trouble we went to to get rid of it.

CoV ; it’s just been pointed out on IRC that if the arrival bug actually happened, people who weren’t actually Artists at the time they apparently voted wouldn’t actually have voted.

can’t we just paper over the ambiguity? :p

I’ll self kill this presently.

S-K. I’ll not repost.