Thursday, October 24, 2019

Proposal: Reis Sources

Reached quorum 4 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Oct 2019 11:21:30 UTC

Add to the list of Assets:

- Blogium: If you are the sole EM (who hasn’t been Idle in the last 72 hours) with the most Blogium Assets, you are the Blogium Lead.
- Nomium: If you are the sole EM (who hasn’t been Idle in the last 72 hours) with the most Nomium Assets, you are the Nomium Lead.
- Icium: If you are the sole EM (who hasn’t been Idle in the last 72 hours) with the most Icium Assets, you are the Icium Lead.

Create a new rule called “Supremacy” with:

If an EM is simultaneously the Blogium Lead, Nomium Lead and Icium Lead for 72 consecutive hours, they achieve victory.

Deliberately easy to counterplay by just getting more -ium. And that itself is counterable by Propaganda/Attacking to keep them down. But there’s a lot of interaction involved there, and interaction seems good to have.

Comments

TyGuy6:

24-10-2019 18:22:20 UTC

Looks fine.
We ought to make it a little more achievable, perhaps. Maybe raise the limit to 6+ assets so that, bare minimum, you can have two of each. Or better yet make it 2 of the 3 required. for

Kevan: he/him

24-10-2019 18:52:33 UTC

against Not buying the easy-to-counterplay angle: this sounds a lot like Cuddlebeam has found a way to knock everyone else into a situation where they can’t produce -ium Assets. Putting someone at zero Assets and <30 IO would be enough, I think - and Minister Cuddlebeam has just urged all nations to put their IOs below 30.

[TyGuy6] You might want to reflect on your “Would vote it down if there existed a real win con” on One Giant Leap now that you’re voting for a win con. If you think the current ruleset wording allows Annual Actions to be taken freely in any quantity, that would - I suspect - be enough for a player to win under this proposed victory condition.

TyGuy6:

24-10-2019 22:59:24 UTC

Kevan, these are insightful, albeit troubling allegations. I strongly doubt that eventuality, however. 72 hours is far too long to hold every other player from having a single fluid Asset. By all means, let’s patch up your slight grammatical mishap. Meanwhile, I look to invent a way to unite our planet against the terrible fate that grows on us yearly…

Farsight:

25-10-2019 22:26:16 UTC

for I must concur with the honourable member TyGuy6, we must take radical action to safeguard the future of our planet.

Kevan: he/him

26-10-2019 11:21:07 UTC

for CoV, long live amusing grammatical mishaps.