Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Proposal: Repaying debts

Timed out 3-5. Failed by card.

Adminned at 26 May 2017 18:54:11 UTC

If either of the two proposals “Supply Transfer 2” and"No free lunch” did not pass, then this proposal has no effect.

Otherwise, amend the rule “Supplies” by substituting:

Explorers may transfer supplies to their current camp ; when doing so, if their Debt is positive, they may reduce it by 1.

for:

Explorers may transfer supplies to their current camp.

Seems logical.

Comments

Madrid:

24-05-2017 17:17:03 UTC

Your quote below should be above and your quote above should be below.

Otherwise, looks gud, would greentick

Cpt_Koen:

24-05-2017 17:36:16 UTC

I believe “substitute A with B” and “substitute B for A” are synonyms.

Madrid:

24-05-2017 17:39:34 UTC

I disagree but I’m not motivated to CFJ it anyway because its a good proposal so for

Madrid:

24-05-2017 17:51:21 UTC

Oh, I see. Cool, ty.

Gaelan:

24-05-2017 17:52:31 UTC

I feel that there should be some sort of interest - taking on debt should not be done unnecessarily.  imperial

Madrid:

24-05-2017 17:56:48 UTC

This is entirely my subjective imagination of the thematic but I see “debt” as owing some gruff man in the tent the stuff back or he’ll throw a snowball into my hot coco, and not really an institutionalized and formal kind of “debt”, like what I’d have with a bank.

Cpt_Koen:

24-05-2017 18:24:45 UTC

Gaelon: do you mean you think there should be a penalty for having contracted a debt?

Gaelan:

24-05-2017 18:31:59 UTC

Yeah.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

24-05-2017 19:40:33 UTC

for

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

24-05-2017 19:41:03 UTC

against Actually, I like not formalized debt.

pokes:

24-05-2017 21:35:50 UTC

imperial

Madrid:

24-05-2017 22:58:51 UTC

All proposals before this one are good to go (reached Quorum)

I really think we need more admins, just 2 for 11 is tough imo

Sphinx:

24-05-2017 23:06:16 UTC

I don’t know, I thought Debt should be a more permanent decision, instead of being able to simply give it back if it isn’t needed.

Maybe change it so only resupplying from base camp costs Debt, but supplies can be freely stored and taken at other outposts? Though then stealing is an issue, so maybe this is the right approach.

However, you could transfer 0 supplies to a camp repeatedly and get rid of all your Debt. Better to directly reduce the Debt by the amount of supplies transferred, I think.

Sphinx:

24-05-2017 23:07:23 UTC

against forgot to vote.

card:

25-05-2017 02:24:54 UTC

imperial

Matt:

25-05-2017 13:58:12 UTC

for