Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Proposal: Repeal 2.7.2, Influential Beacon.

Timed out (4-1 excluding now-idle voters)
Enacted by Hix

Adminned at 25 Aug 2006 08:30:59 UTC

Proposal,

Repeal section 2.7.2,  Influential Beacon

Comments

Kevan: he/him

23-08-2006 15:30:19 UTC

for

Thelonious:

23-08-2006 16:48:37 UTC

for

ChronosPhaenon:

23-08-2006 16:58:19 UTC

against

Thelonious:

23-08-2006 17:15:22 UTC

Any particular reason?

Hix:

23-08-2006 20:38:18 UTC

imperial

Shadowclaw:

23-08-2006 21:46:18 UTC

for

Can Hix even do that?

Hix:

24-08-2006 00:43:28 UTC

I have, thus proving I can.  It’s not a vote, though.

epylar:

24-08-2006 02:12:01 UTC

“Arbiter cannot cast a vote of DEFERENTIAL.”—meaning that under the definition of ‘casting a vote’, Hix did not actually vote.

As to why: The influential beacon thing just seems kind of messy now.

epylar:

24-08-2006 02:15:53 UTC

Also note that the word ‘may’ simply means ‘can unless something else says cannot or otherwise conflicts’.

So if one rule said:

Epylar may travel to any point in history at any time.

And another rule said:

Epylar cannot travel to any point in history at any time.

I would be unable to travel.

If we didn’t have this meaning, then either Hix is not a Traveller, or Hix -did- vote, but not in a way that could be counted for or against the proposition.

Bucky:

24-08-2006 03:51:42 UTC

He did not vote.  He used a voting icon to communicate his indecision.

for

aran:

24-08-2006 18:55:54 UTC

against i think it’s nice and harmless.