Saturday, March 18, 2006

Call for Judgment: Reuterz

Reaches quorum, fails. Failed by Personman.

Adminned at 21 Mar 2006 21:34:40 UTC

Whereas the ruleset states that “Any Gostak who can get both eir Blognomic name and the URL of the new Blognomic home page in either Associated Press or Reuters shall gain 100 Distimmed Dosh.”

and whereas there is only one text field or other game object within the scope of Blognomic called Reuters,

and whereas that object contains the text “http://blognomic.com Bucky,”

and whereas Bucky was the one who put that text into Reuters,

Give Bucky 100 Distimmed Dosh.

posted by Bucky at 18 Mar 2006 20:55:40 UTC Comments (15)

Comments

Hix:

19-03-2006 01:17:47 UTC

against Um, I don’t believe that we’re tolerating naming scams this dynasty.

Quazie:

19-03-2006 02:02:15 UTC

against

Elias IX:

19-03-2006 02:41:12 UTC

against

90000:

19-03-2006 03:03:18 UTC

against

Bucky:

19-03-2006 04:15:58 UTC

imperial

Angry Grasshopper:

19-03-2006 04:18:48 UTC

Maybe if we had defined ‘Reuters’ or ‘AP’ to have some other definition, but as it stands..

against

Bucky:

19-03-2006 04:38:48 UTC

Reuters and AP were not defined until I posted “Reuters”.

Igthorn:

19-03-2006 06:10:16 UTC

against

Kevan: Concierge he/him

19-03-2006 11:07:08 UTC

against

Excalabur:

19-03-2006 18:45:13 UTC

They’re ‘defined as in the english language’.  And the posting is /not/ a definition, only the ruleset can override the glossary’s speicification for undefined words. against  against  against

smith:

20-03-2006 02:13:27 UTC

against

Personman:

20-03-2006 04:30:47 UTC

for I actually kinda thought he found a valid loophole there. I’m totally fine with this vote not changing anything, and in fact I think I’ll change it in a minute to get to Quorum faster, but I’m just sayin’.

Personman:

20-03-2006 04:31:05 UTC

against As promised.

The Lone Amigo:

20-03-2006 09:28:56 UTC

against

Bucky:

20-03-2006 18:35:35 UTC

QUORUM!