Proposal: Rewards for Stolen Ideas
Fails 2-6. — Quirck
Adminned at 20 Sep 2012 01:44:30 UTC
Enact a new rule entitled “[COR] Corrections” with the following text:
A Proposal is a Correction if it satisfies the following (possibly in the flavour text):
- It contains a Citation to another Proposal (the Original).
- The Original was authored by a different Student.
- The Original was Pending when the Correction was submitted.
- It explicitly indicates that it is a Correction of the Original.
- It contains an explanation of one or more errors in the Original.
Students should not vote FOR a Correction unless it proposes substantially the same changes as the Original and it fixes the errors described.
A Student may make a Story Post containing Citations to an enacted Correction they wrote and that Correction’s failed Original, and claiming to Score by COR. If a Student does so, they Score.
As an example:
Citation: http://blognomic.com/archive/peer_review/
This is a correction to the cited proposal
Correcting the earlier version by removing the ability to correct your own self-killed proposal and also making the correction’s author responsible for scoring for consistency with VPP.
scshunt:
This doesn’t solve your own comment to my version, and requiring the post is inconsistent with IFI (or whatever that one is)