Monday, January 17, 2022

Proposal: Senioritis

Times out and passes, 8-0. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 19 Jan 2022 19:19:45 UTC

Replace the list of hierarchical ranks in the rule “Job Titles” with the following:

8. CEO
7. Vice-President
6. Director
5. Manager
4. Executive
3. Team Leader
2. Administrator
1. Officer
0. Intern

An Employee’s Seniority may be determined by the number of the rank that Employee holds per the above list; for instance, the CEO has a Seniority of 8, and an Intern has a Seniority of 0.

If there exists a rule called “Incentive Formula” then reword it as follows:

The Incentive Formula for an Employee is as follows:

* Whenever an Employee receives an increase in Options, the amount of Options they receive is equal to their Seniority, plus half the number of Employees they Manage, rounded down.

Josh said he was leaving the Incentive Formula patchy, so I’m patching it.

Comments

Josh: he/they

17-01-2022 17:25:39 UTC

So this results in a much more even pattern of Options gain, with a VP getting 9 Options here instead of 21; I wonder if that’s a good thing? I kind of liked having ranks be very swingy, with big gains for holding a high rank but limited possibility for retaining it

Brendan: he/him

17-01-2022 19:42:58 UTC

I’m leaning toward a little more even distribution because think the potential pattern of change in the Budget is already a swing factor—with the right interdepartmental coordination, 3 Options could be worth more than 9.

Brendan: he/him

17-01-2022 19:43:52 UTC

(That is, 3 Options on Monday could be worth more than 9 Options on Tuesday, etc.)

TyGuy6:

18-01-2022 02:12:50 UTC

for

Josh: he/they

18-01-2022 10:03:11 UTC

for

lemon: she/her

18-01-2022 11:41:51 UTC

for

Snisbo: she/they

18-01-2022 15:06:06 UTC

for

Raven1207: he/they

18-01-2022 15:16:36 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

18-01-2022 16:03:59 UTC

for

Silverwing: she/her

18-01-2022 20:16:07 UTC

for