Sunday, April 16, 2023

Proposal: Are You Shakesperienced?

Times out 7-0. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 18 Apr 2023 19:03:01 UTC

Reword the text “As a Daily Action, if the Building is not Collapsed, an Engineer with at least as many Safety Checks as the current Building Number may Build” in the rule “The Building” to

As a Daily Action, if the Building is not Collapsed, an Engineer who has at least as many Safety Checks as there are Gaps, or at least as many Safety Checks as the current Building Number, may Build

The stated intention behind the originally Safety Check floor rule was to prevent new or inactive players from collapsing the building, but that’s not how it actually functions, since the Building Number is unrelated to its actual stability. If we want to just stop people from knocking the tower over arbitrarily, then it makes more sense to connect the limit to whether the building is actually unstable.

Comments

Lulu: she/her

17-04-2023 10:47:36 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

17-04-2023 11:05:03 UTC

for

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

17-04-2023 12:41:49 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

17-04-2023 14:32:09 UTC

I should have used the word “actually” more times there.

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

17-04-2023 15:12:45 UTC

Actually, yes. ;-)

Josh: he/they

17-04-2023 20:37:04 UTC

for

Taiga: he/him

17-04-2023 22:29:42 UTC

for

Habanero:

17-04-2023 22:49:27 UTC

for