Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Proposal: Small paradox

Timed out 9 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Jun 2012 08:49:21 UTC

In the ruleset, replace “If a Dynasty has no Historical Information listed, that dynasty is considered Lost.”
with “If a Dynasty other than Dynasty 100 has no Historical Information listed, that Dynasty is considered Lost.”

This is not really important maybe, but “If a Dynasty has no Historical Information listed, that dynasty is considered Lost. Dynasty 100 cannot be Lost.” sounds like a contradiction to me, since the UTD only lists Dynasties 1 to 99.

posted by Cpt_Koen at 05 Jun 2012 14:36:19 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Rodney:

05-06-2012 16:55:25 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

05-06-2012 22:56:27 UTC

for

BobTHJ:

05-06-2012 23:01:50 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

06-06-2012 00:48:48 UTC

“If both contradicting parts are a Core Rule, or if both of them are a Dynastic Rule, the part with more limited scope applies. (e.g. if the rules “Time Monks may Kick each other” and “Time Monks may not kick each other on Tuesdays” exist, and it is Tuesday, Time Monks may not Kick each other.)”

The line about dynasty 100 is more limited in scope, and so it applies. No contradiction.

moonroof:

06-06-2012 01:40:27 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

06-06-2012 07:04:26 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

06-06-2012 08:33:13 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

06-06-2012 18:22:00 UTC

for

quirck: he/him

06-06-2012 19:42:27 UTC

for