Sunday, October 11, 2009

Proposal: So… much… work…

Self-killed, (5/9 Trivial); no fines—arth

Adminned at 13 Oct 2009 13:47:05 UTC

Add the following to “Accountability”:

Whenever an admin enacts or fails a Call For Judgement, a proposal, or a Declaration of victory, he is awarded 2 points
Whenever an admin adds, idles or unidles any number of players, they are awarded 1 point per player.

It’s sometimes quite complex, especially if Bucky’s proposal passes.

Comments

Bucky:

10-11-2009 20:35:46 UTC

against Trivial

An Admin can repeatedly idle and unidle emself for as many points as e wishes.

Klisz:

10-11-2009 20:38:09 UTC

against  [Trivial]

Oze:

10-11-2009 20:44:22 UTC

against[Trivial]

Ienpw III:

10-11-2009 20:51:33 UTC

against sk per bucky

Wakukee:

10-12-2009 00:14:44 UTC

against I know this is unnessesery. but I wish to strongly convey my opinion that proposals favoring admins are particularily unfair. This gives admins a chance for points that other do not have. For that reason, this should not be reproposed, even with the “fix” of the idle part.

Ienpw III:

10-12-2009 00:31:31 UTC

CoV against [Trivial]
But… it’s so… much… work…

Excalabur:

10-12-2009 02:00:30 UTC

Wak: The game had a small reward for administrating a proposal for several years, so this is hardly unprecedented.  We seem currently to have a stack of admins, though, some of whom are quite keen.

ais523:

10-12-2009 09:57:25 UTC

against [Trivial] just in case we decide to add penalties for not voting on s/ks…

spikebrennan:

10-12-2009 15:42:51 UTC

against Trivial

Qwazukee:

10-13-2009 00:16:11 UTC

for Except for the Idle problem, of course.