Wednesday, April 06, 2011

Proposal: So I guess we never actually fixed this, huh

Failing for s/k. ~lilomar

Adminned at 08 Apr 2011 12:32:17 UTC

In the rule entitled “Locked Stations”, remove Mornington Crescent from the list, and add the following to the end of that rule:

Additionally, Mornington Crescent is Sealed. Sealed stations are subject to the same movement restrictions as Locked stations.

While we’re arguing over what the victory condition should look like, let’s put MC safely over here, out of the way.

Comments

Kevan: he/him

06-04-2011 21:17:05 UTC

The word “movement” is a bit open to interpretation, there.

Subrincinator:

06-04-2011 21:39:51 UTC

for

Josh: he/him

06-04-2011 22:03:41 UTC

@Kevan - it would be a slightly tenuous interpretation if it resolved differently to the way that “move” is currently defined in rule 2.6, I think.

Kevan: he/him

06-04-2011 23:22:04 UTC

I was more concerned about Rule 2.5, really, but it looks okay on closer inspection, as it also uses the verb “move”. It does leave us open to a later Oddity or piece-relocation mechanic that happens to use a different sentence structure, though. Your new rule effectively says that the “A player may never place their piece on a locked station.” sentence of Rule 2.10 does not apply to Sealed Stations.

for

Darknight: he/him

07-04-2011 03:11:14 UTC

for

Chivalrybean:

07-04-2011 06:20:25 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

07-04-2011 07:08:23 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

07-04-2011 10:39:49 UTC

against CoV. As Josh points out here, “subject to the same movement restrictions as Locked stations” can be read as only applying to the Stations, not the Pieces. (So it’s just saying that Mornington Crescent’ isn’t allowed to move itself.)

Ely:

07-04-2011 12:27:09 UTC

against

Josh: he/him

07-04-2011 14:22:18 UTC

against s/k, then. Kevan, your vote here would seem to be consistent with an s/k on your own proposal? Not that it does anything now, admittedly.

In the meanwhile, MC is still vulnerable to a single unlock, so if someone with slots wants to propose a seal that works then that would probably be a good idea…

Travis:

07-04-2011 18:04:03 UTC

imperial

udqbpn:

08-04-2011 08:03:05 UTC

imperial

Josh: he/him

08-04-2011 08:03:48 UTC

This is self-killed, guys, you can stop voting on it.