Thursday, August 03, 2006

Proposal: Solo Shoots First

Timed out 3-2.—Kevan

Adminned at 05 Aug 2006 05:34:21 UTC

If the proposal “No solo passes” failed, replace the text

It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours, more than half of its votes are FOR, and it has not been vetoed or self-killed.

in the rule “Enactment” with:

It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours, it has more than 1 valid vote, more than half of its votes are FOR, and it has not been vetoed or self-killed.

and insert a bullet between bullets 4 and 5 with the following text:

It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours and has fewer than 2 valid votes.

[ Bucky has claimed that Imperial votes will cause this change to “malfunction”, and Hix has voted against it, but it’s unclear whether there’s anything actually wrong with it or this is just a misunderstanding. Might as well get this back into the queue now before anyone puts a one-vote local-proposal scam in. ]

posted by Kevan at 03 Aug 2006 11:38:00 UTC Comments (6)

Comments

Thelonious:

03-08-2006 12:19:48 UTC

for

Bucky:

03-08-2006 17:02:39 UTC

against .

Hix:

03-08-2006 19:03:39 UTC

against

TAE:

03-08-2006 20:05:34 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

04-08-2006 04:03:54 UTC

So you’re just opposed to the idea, then, rather than there being any actual “malfunction”?

Bucky:

04-08-2006 20:06:56 UTC

A) Yes there is a possibe malfunction and
B) Even if there weren’t I would oppose a core ruleset change to stop a dynastic scam, especially since
C) Proposing a leveraged Local Proposal which nobody else can get to is perfectly within the spirit of this dynasty.