Call for Judgment: Soup Starvation Settlement
Reached quorum 5 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.
Adminned at 27 Jul 2019 16:30:07 UTC
Reasoning in Commentary.
Duel: TyGuy6 vs naught was judged invalidly because it was before both players had submitted valid plans, (but without eliminating the wizard who had submitted no valid plan). derrick’s comment (at or around 07-27-2019 13:07:10 UTC) to that purpose may be ignored with regard to gamestate.
Therefore, derrick’s subsequent judgment of Duel: TyGuy6 vs Ienpw III was premature, and may similarly be ignored.
As follows naturally, undo the effects of the above-mentioned judgments, such as Elimination of TyGuy6 and Ienpw III, and the awarding of favor to the supposed Triumphants.
Reasoning:
naught had 1 food, attempted to take 28 food by Visiting the Soup Kitchen, then to spend 28 to breed three creatures, which he submitted in an invalid plan.
A Wizard who Visits the Soup Kitchen receives 7 Food per each time that the King has performed the weekly action of increasing every Wizard’s Food described above but didn’t alter that Wizard’s (the one who is Visiting the Soup Kitchen) Food during that action.
naught’s food had been unaltered in three such actions by King derrick, on July 1, 8, and 18. The food given after July 25 was not given by the King. naught was only owed 21 food, and thus had only enough food for two of the three creatures (all which were bred at the same time).
Also, you can only fill one creature slot with a tactic in a battle plan, as I read it, and naught did two. So that’s an independent second reasoning for this CfJ.
Kevan: he/him