A couple of wording issues here. ‘Topic is listed as a game state’ doesn’t, I think, mean anything, and while the intention (‘The Topic is a publicly tracked variable’) is clear enough I think that the current wording is, at best, unusable, and at worst scammable.

‘After the Puzzler has performed an Acrogenerate action but before Wordsmith have Backronym action’ is not time-bound - because Wordsmiths have already performed Backronym actions in this dynasty this rule would never be able to fire off.

I also don’t understand why DICE1000 is being used rather than DICE5.

I’m leaning in any case, though, as restricting the play space to these 5 topics seems artificially limiting.

I put 1000 just in case someone wanted to add topics in

We could certainly propose more list items (and die faces) while the next round was happening. It’s such a strange blind spot in BlogNomic that we don’t expand on half the lists that we create, even though those would be such easy proposals to write. I still haven’t quite worked out why that is.

for seeming too restrictive in combination with Prompts; some will give us a challenging constraint, but others seem like they’ll fall flat (“some famous last words, including a currency”). Given that this proposal is described as adding “topics” to the game, I don’t know if Raven overlooked the the enacted proposal to add “topics” in the form of Prompts a few days ago.

Point to ponder: what are the odds of an acronym being impossible under the Numbers topic? Most numbers start with the same handful of letters.

I did overlook that