Friday, October 21, 2011

Proposal: Striking back

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:56:34 UTC

Immediately idle every Artist whose final vote in the Call for Judgment: CFJ: Attn: CotC was for.

SKed. -Ornithopter

Comments

ais523:

21-10-2011 15:28:21 UTC

against I’m not sure how useful this would be, especially as there were more meatpuppets with votes on the BlogNomic side than the Agora side. In fact, it might even be beneficial to forcing through a similar CFJ in the future, as the BlogNomic meatpuppets would be stuck in unidle timeout at about the same time, while the Agorans would be out of it.

The Agoran players are mostly willing to play the dynasty too, as far as I know. Are you?

zuff:

21-10-2011 15:28:40 UTC

I agree. You should definitely idle out people like ais523 and coppro; that is the mature response to these silly invaders. Especially if you are, in fact, playing Calvinball.

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 15:32:13 UTC

@zuff: Stop being a dick. http://blognomic.com/archive/okay_look/

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 15:32:13 UTC

While I agree it is childish it isn’t permanent. People that were part of the nvasion that want to play can simply rejoin the game and play.

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 15:32:18 UTC

against Hey, come on. Some of us aren’t meatpuppets, but actual players that have a nice history here. Sure, I sided with Agora on that post. That doesn’t mean I should be kicked out of the game. =S

How about something like “Idle every player that doesn’t vote on this CfJ”? That would really weed out the nonplayers, not just everyone on one side.

zuff:

21-10-2011 15:33:17 UTC

Ornithopter: When you claim higher moral ground and bring meatpuppets in at the very last minute, it’s kind of hard to take things like that seriously.

Anyway, this proposal is being a dick more than my comment.

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 15:35:43 UTC

against
Unnecessary and, as ais points out, potentially harmful.

pikhq:

21-10-2011 15:38:32 UTC

against Sets bad precedent, even with the invasion of Agorans.

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 15:39:24 UTC

against

scshunt:

21-10-2011 15:39:53 UTC

against

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 15:39:57 UTC

I didn’t claim moral high ground, zuff, I just claimed you were being a dick, and told you to stop. If you would like to explain to me how a completely legal proposal constitutes Calvinball, I’ll happily apologize.

Murphy:

21-10-2011 15:40:04 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 15:42:23 UTC

against since calvinball is one of original bomics I don’t really see the insult so whatever :)

eelpout:

21-10-2011 15:43:48 UTC

against I hope I have some time to play for real here.  I’ll idle myself if not.

zuff:

21-10-2011 15:45:01 UTC

Ornithopter: The Calvinball was the statement that CotC had been adminned.

But whatever; your game.

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 16:00:15 UTC

against

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 16:07:09 UTC

Zuff, the claim that you were referring to the adminning of the CfJ when you brought up Calvinball is patently false. Further, said adminning was, by all appearances, an honest mistake.

I’m tired of arguing with you. Say whatever you want. Your insults are annoying, but they aren’t going to sway anyone.

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 16:07:12 UTC

[zuff] I don’t know for how many time you are around here. From the time I’m around, tradition says an Admin has some leeway in interpreting the ruleset where it’s is not crystal clear.

Just because you don’t agree with me on the matter of rebelyellow’s announcement as a player, it doesn’t make the game I’m playing Calvinball.

As you can see, I readily agreed with coppro when he pointed out lass’s vote was invalid - because it was clearly invalid and I missed it when doing the admin.

Prince Anduril:

21-10-2011 16:20:13 UTC

against

Play nice.

Clucky: he/him

21-10-2011 16:30:15 UTC

against

No reason to be dicks to people just because they were dicks to you. Then you wind up with a world of dicks and as a straight guy I don’t want that =P

Although Roujo, when you say “but actual players that have a nice history here.” I hope you realize that by supporting this ludicrous stunt you are essentially permanently tarnishing your reputation here.

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 16:32:08 UTC

against

Rodney:

21-10-2011 16:45:58 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 16:59:30 UTC

Clucky: I guess I’ll have to work on not caring what people think of my actions. =(

Bucky:

21-10-2011 17:16:14 UTC

against

southpointingchariot:

21-10-2011 17:54:02 UTC

against

Wooble:

21-10-2011 17:59:16 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 18:55:03 UTC

for

Klisz:

21-10-2011 18:56:08 UTC

for @Roujo: Clucky can be rather elitist like that at times. Really now, very few people will actually judge you for it.

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 20:51:34 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

22-10-2011 09:32:26 UTC

against

Josh: Observer he/they

22-10-2011 10:23:53 UTC

against

flurie:

22-10-2011 15:54:21 UTC

against

monqy:

22-10-2011 17:20:27 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

22-10-2011 20:30:19 UTC

against

zuff:

22-10-2011 21:46:37 UTC

against Might as well help quorum.

ChronosPhaenon:

22-10-2011 21:54:24 UTC

against S-K