Monday, October 18, 2021

Call for Judgment: Tenting, Status Quo Part 1 [Core]

Failed 1 vote to 7. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 19 Oct 2021 08:21:58 UTC

Remove the parenthetical statement after the text “If the game is in an Interregnum then the new Drone must either Pass the Mantle, by making a post naming another Citizen” in the rule Victory and Ascension.

Add a new Special Case rule immediately under Dynastic Distance, called “Malign Emperors [Rare]”; if the Drone’s EVC on this CfJ includes the phrase “Maximum Suppression Mode Activated”, add the [Active] tag to its title, otherwise, add the [Inactive] tag to its title. Give it the following text:

The Drone may be recipient of the Mantle, as if they were a Citizen, during an Interregnum, as per the rule Victory and Ascension. The Drone may not cast a vote of VETO on any Proposal whose effect is limited to the dynastic rules or gamestate; any such vote is disregarded for the purposes of proposal resolution.

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

18-10-2021 14:51:31 UTC

Is this the exact same text as In Tents?

Because if so it’s not necessary: In Tents doesn’t need tags as it’s unambiguously signposted.

Chiiika: she/her

18-10-2021 14:56:23 UTC

This is the exact same text as Tents, added tags if somebody decides to CfJ that enactment.

Josh: Observer he/they

18-10-2021 15:00:02 UTC

against duplicated effect

Brendan: he/him

18-10-2021 15:58:28 UTC

against

Zack: he/him

18-10-2021 17:44:52 UTC

against

Raven1207: he/they

18-10-2021 19:06:29 UTC

against

lemon: she/her

18-10-2021 20:43:56 UTC

against

TyGuy6:

18-10-2021 22:14:48 UTC

against (But arrow for the intent/effort.)

Kevan: he/him

19-10-2021 08:21:31 UTC

against Duplication, and also a bad core change to make the rule vaguer without changing the legality of anything: an Imperial mantle pass would remain legal.