Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Proposal: The League of True Botanists

Fails at 3-9. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 16 Jun 2011 01:05:33 UTC

Create a new rule entitled “League of True Botanists”:-

True Botanists are Farmers who belong to the League of True Botanists and support Florw as their Landlord.  True Botanist status is tracked within the GNDT.  Only Florw may bestow True Botanist status; he will inform the Farmers whom he has bestowed True Botanist status upon by private message.  True Botanist status is not mandatory if bestowed; a Farmer may accept or refuse True Botanist status.  If a Farmer accepts True Botanist status, they must alter the GNDT immediately to reflect this acceptance.  True Botanist status is permanent and irrevocable upon acceptance.  If at least seven (7) Farmers become True Botanists, Florw immediately assumes the position of Landlord.  If another Landlord is already in existence, they become a normal Farmer and lose their Landlord status.  Upon Florw’s assumption of Landlordship, the title “Landlord” immediately is changed to “High Keeper of the Secrets of the Grand Art of Botany”.  Also, upon Florw’s assumption of Landlordship, all Players are immediately, without choice, drafted into the League of True Botanists.

Comments

Bucky:

14-06-2011 17:27:21 UTC

against .  Among numerous other objections, it does not follow the normal procedure for dynasty switching.

Florw:

14-06-2011 17:30:10 UTC

Who said it was dynasty switching?

SingularByte: he/him

14-06-2011 18:00:44 UTC

against This doesn’t really do anything. Even if you get a quorum of people to agree to let you win for no reason, you can’t bestow True Botanist status, by rule 3.3.5

Ely:

14-06-2011 18:14:35 UTC

against TRIVIAL

Winner:

14-06-2011 21:25:09 UTC

against

Yoda:

14-06-2011 21:45:18 UTC

against Ummmm… what?  Where did this come from?

BellEt:

14-06-2011 22:11:24 UTC

against and yoda, why not VETO?

Ely:

14-06-2011 22:39:55 UTC

He keeps it for completely trivial proposals. :P

Just kidding Yoda, I think you’re doing a great job.

qwertyu63:

14-06-2011 23:08:19 UTC

against

aguydude:

14-06-2011 23:10:14 UTC

against

mideg:

15-06-2011 04:21:41 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

15-06-2011 08:15:57 UTC

against

Yoda:

15-06-2011 15:12:12 UTC

Doctor29: I figure that if people really really really want a rule like this to be in, who am I to stop them?  I’m trusting that there’s enough sane people active right now who won’t vote for something like this, and it seems my assumption is correct. :-)

Ely:

15-06-2011 15:27:22 UTC

for Because Yoda’s assumptions can’t be correct.

ais523:

15-06-2011 15:35:13 UTC

for Because I think this might be part of a scam. It’s not going to pass anyway, but if the scam works, I want to be in favour of it.

Ely:

15-06-2011 15:38:32 UTC

[ais]
lol
I thought this might be something about proposal enactement, but I can’t find the weak spot in the ruleset.

aguydude:

15-06-2011 23:07:43 UTC

Yoda: Your reply was just begging for people to change their vote out of spite.  Alas, I am too sane to do so.