I think we should define dynastic gameplay. For me, dynastic play is things which regard the dynastic ruleset, specifically. He didn’t say he was going to modify the dynastic rules, did he?

I agree with Ty; I’d go further and argue that while there are no dynastic rules there is ipso facto no dynastic gameplay, and therefore No Collabs is currently not meaningfully in effect.

(quick reminder; wdt’s pronouns are hu/hum)

Thank you. But I don’t intend to use pronouns whose meaning and purpose I don’t understand.

@TyGuy6 I’m trans and that’s just how I wanna be referred to because it’s ultimately what works best. god this is not the sorta conversation i need to have tonight

@TyGuy6 I’m trans and that’s just how I wanna be referred to because it’s ultimately what works best. god this is not the sorta conversation i need to have tonight

why did it post twice

if you press the submit button one too many times it does that

It just does that sometimes.

@wdt If it causes anxiety, I’m sorry. I’m willing to use the agender they/them, which is more familiar to me. If it helps, I’m also feel vulnerable and unsure in taking this kind of a stance, but it’s the response I feel like I need to make, to speak honestly.

this isn’t a proposal what

Not sure what could be more clear about the meaning or purpose of hus pronouns. “Hu” if hu’s the subject of the sentence, “hum” if hu’s the object. It’s not complicated.

@TyGuy6 Hu has set out a legible cheatsheet for how hu wants to be referred to; ‘they/them’ is also not preferred. It looks like you can use it/it’s, if hu/hum is genuinely too much for you to wrap your head around.