Saturday, February 27, 2010

The revenge of the return of the son of the corrected nephew of the arrows, part III

Create a new rule, “Flavour Rewards”:

When voting on a proposal, Commoners should include an arrow icon (:ARROW:) in comments in which they vote, if they think the proposal is particularly flavourful or has good flavour text; this is not a voting icon, but can be used additionally to voting icons in the same comment. Within 48 hours of a proposal being enacted or failed, its author can increase his own Coal by the number of EVCs on that proposal that include arrow items, excluding EVCs by the proposal’s author but including EVCs by the Mad Prince, but only if he has not performed this action with respect to that proposal before.

Fixing a bug pointed out by Rodlen; now it counts arrowed comments, rather than arrows themselves.

Comments

Rodlen:

27-02-2010 22:37:26 UTC

Uh…

ais523:

27-02-2010 22:38:02 UTC

Also, htf did I end up with the flavour text box inside the blockquote?

Josh: Observer he/they

27-02-2010 22:38:34 UTC

He could have fixed it until you commented!

against because really, the flavour text does not need to be in the ruleset.

Rodlen:

27-02-2010 22:38:44 UTC

Because the blog is awesome in ways that none shall understand.

redtara: they/them

28-02-2010 03:09:27 UTC

for

Klisz:

28-02-2010 05:31:26 UTC

The flavor text box got into the blockquote because instead of a closing tag, you put another blockquote tag. Evidently unclosed blockquote = flavor text inside blockquote.

Keba:

28-02-2010 11:34:32 UTC

against and would be against even, if the flavour were not in the Rule…

redtara: they/them

28-02-2010 16:49:03 UTC

I know what the text means. It is obvious that the flavour is not meant to be part of the rule. Notice that nowhere in the ruleset does it say that whatever is in blockquote goes in the rules.

lordcooper:

28-02-2010 21:23:15 UTC

against  as this could allow multiple arrowed comments by the same Commoner

Klisz:

28-02-2010 21:49:32 UTC

lordcooper: It says “EVC”, not “comment”.

hellzapoppin:

01-03-2010 07:46:01 UTC

against

dbdougla:

02-03-2010 01:55:56 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

02-03-2010 04:35:38 UTC

Is not a proposal.