Friday, October 09, 2009

Proposal: [Theft] A non so paranoid rule

Passes 13-1, +10 arthexis—arthexis

Adminned at 11 Oct 2009 10:08:33 UTC

Create a new rule, “Rule Changes are Secured (Blue)”:

A rule change is any of the following:

(a) The creation of a rule.
(b) The repeal of a rule.
(c) The alteration of a rule’s text.
(d) The alteration of a rule’s clearance.

Rule changes are only possible as explicitly defined by the rules.

Rule Rule 1-2/0 of ParaNomic-XP

posted by arthexis at 09 Oct 2009 20:27:32 UTC Comments (16)

Comments

Bucky:

09-10-2009 20:36:06 UTC

for .  That looks like an explicit definition to me.

redtara: they/them

09-10-2009 20:49:04 UTC

for I can see this becoming Core, someday.

Klisz:

09-10-2009 20:51:45 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

09-10-2009 21:49:22 UTC

for Meaningless, but sure. And good to see that ParaNomic came back.

Josh: Observer he/they

09-10-2009 22:17:48 UTC

for Can these be trivial as well?

Excalabur:

10-10-2009 01:24:10 UTC

for [Trivial]  Except for “clearance”...

Darknight: he/him

10-10-2009 02:16:49 UTC

for

Rodlen:

10-10-2009 02:34:19 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

10-10-2009 02:52:27 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

10-10-2009 02:54:06 UTC

Ops CoV for

spikebrennan:

10-10-2009 03:42:40 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

10-10-2009 07:35:07 UTC

I think theft proposals should not be able to be marked as trivial, that would take the incentive off of making them.

Oze:

10-10-2009 21:10:22 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

10-10-2009 22:17:21 UTC

Oze’s vote is illegal as it was made during the hiatus of Darth’s DoV. But this has hit quorum anyway.

ais523:

11-10-2009 11:44:36 UTC

for Because this is going to pass and I want some points from it.

Oze:

11-10-2009 13:51:40 UTC

for Hiatus is over. Sorry all.