My reading, correct me if im wrong.

2.3.2
“Often, an Olympian may give every current Olympian one Training Point, provided no other Olympian has done so that day. If e does so, he must give every current Olympian the training point. “

Thats what was done for everyone, and it is often

2.6
“Normal Trainer: Requirements: None. Any Olympian without a trainer has this trainer. Effect: An Olympian using this trainer may occasionally increase eir training points by one. “

Thats what was done individually for me, since I hadn’t had one this week.

ChinDoGu is right.

And yeah. For future reference, I’ll point you to rule 1.7 “All updates to the GNDT are logged - if a Olympian feels that an alteration goes against the Rules (as they were at the time of the alteration), e may simply undo the effects of that alteration. If such an undoing is disputed, a Call for Judgment shall be raised.”

Basically, in the case where someone had actually doing something against the rules, you could’ve just changed that without the need for a CfJ.

Or if your not sure, just make a post here asking if you are reading things right.  Dosn’t need to be a cfj unless you get in a disagreement with someone else about interpretation.

It might help to clear up the meaning of the normal trainer (I’m working on it) but I don’t see that any rules were violated either.

If this CfJ passed, nothing would happen since it doesn’t specify any changes to the Gamestate.

  I don’t know.

apologies, thought i’d voted already