Friday, June 02, 2023

Proposal: Trying to bugfix before the cheese melt thru the reality hole 2.0

wd, chiiika.

Adminned at 02 Jun 2023 18:46:58 UTC

Adds the following phrase after “Each Mindjacker has a Level, which is a publicly-tracked non-negative integer defaulting to 1.” at Levels of Reality;

Each Mindjacker has a Suspicion, which is a publicly tracked non-negative integer that defaults to 0.

Remove the phrase “Each Mindjacker has a Suspicion, which is a publicly tracked non-negative integer that defaults to 0.” from Reality Enforcers.


Trapdoorspyder: he/him

02-06-2023 04:55:16 UTC



02-06-2023 05:20:26 UTC

Redex, unnecessary as before.

lemon: she/her

02-06-2023 05:35:50 UTC

yeah, what bucky said

Kevan: he/him

02-06-2023 09:20:08 UTC

against Not seeing the bug here.

lemon: she/her

02-06-2023 09:25:53 UTC


Josh: he/they

02-06-2023 10:38:50 UTC


JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

02-06-2023 13:13:45 UTC

Just to check: if “Each Mindjacker has a Suspicion” is only on Tier 2, does that mean that Mindjackers on Tier 1 do not have a Suspicion? So in the gamestate there will be these variables fluctuating in and out of existence for Mindjackers, where some Mindjackers have them and others don’t.

Maybe that is what’s desired, but I wanted to see if that’s how others are reading this.


02-06-2023 14:42:22 UTC

Yes, that’s my interpretation; Level 1 Mindjackers have no defined Suspicion value, but their Suspicion becomes 1 when they leave level 1.


JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

02-06-2023 16:08:09 UTC

against Ok, so it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. Seems appropriate for alternate realities.

Raven1207: he/they

02-06-2023 16:31:00 UTC



02-06-2023 17:27:14 UTC

for Better to have the variable for everyone I believe. Otherwise what will “When a Mindjacker’s Level is decreased, their Suspicion is set to 0.” will do to a Mindjacker whose Level decreases to 1?

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

02-06-2023 17:34:08 UTC

[summai] The variable would be removed from that Mindjacker, so “their Suspicion is set to 0” would have no effect since it doesn’t exist for them.

Chiiika: she/her

02-06-2023 18:01:18 UTC

against wd


02-06-2023 18:24:23 UTC

[JonathanDark] That’s a good point. However I don’t see the harm in having it defined for everyone