Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Proposal: Vive le Veto!

Reaches quorum 1-12 and fails - coppro

Adminned at 12 Apr 2011 19:35:51 UTC

In rule 1.5 “Resolution of Proposals”, just after the second bulleted list, add

Additionally, proposals that the Chairman has voted to VETO may be failed instantly by any admin.

Reproposal of ais’s.

Comments

Bucky:

12-04-2011 05:13:06 UTC

against , but see Control Queue for a more in-theme version.

Josh: he/him

12-04-2011 05:36:41 UTC

against As always.

scshunt:

12-04-2011 06:36:06 UTC

arrow

Purplebeard:

12-04-2011 07:13:51 UTC

against

William:

12-04-2011 07:23:23 UTC

against

udqbpn:

12-04-2011 07:56:24 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

12-04-2011 08:33:57 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

12-04-2011 11:41:38 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

12-04-2011 15:31:12 UTC

against This /does/ seem to be a recurring idea. =P

lilomar:

12-04-2011 17:08:11 UTC

against because we did just rehash this. Not much has changed except for the dynasty, and if that is the difference, then a dynastic rule would be appropriate.

Subrincinator:

12-04-2011 19:18:24 UTC

imperial

Darknight: he/him

12-04-2011 20:24:09 UTC

against

ais523:

12-04-2011 20:33:39 UTC

veto Procedural

Now is the wrong time.

(Note: I’m aware that this sort of veto doesn’t work…)

Saakara:

12-04-2011 22:45:30 UTC

against

Chivalrybean:

13-04-2011 01:34:16 UTC

against Baa.

lilomar:

13-04-2011 02:01:50 UTC

is anyone elses BNScript not working on this prop? it should be marked vetoed…