Sunday, August 23, 2009

Call for Judgment: Well, if he really wants it. . .

Fails with 9 :against: and only 1 :for:—Wakukee

Adminned at 23 Aug 2009 09:33:44 UTC

Ban arthexis.

There is no loophole here, unlike arth’s own CfJ. If he really wants to be banned, he should vote FOR this.

Comments

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 00:40:08 UTC

against

Rodlen: Idle

23-08-2009 00:47:59 UTC

against Sometimes, it feels like the fair play rules bring us nothing but stuff like this.

Wakukee: Idle

23-08-2009 00:54:34 UTC

imperial

Wakukee: Idle

23-08-2009 00:54:58 UTC

Specific abstain. I will vote after arth does.

Wakukee: Idle

23-08-2009 00:56:30 UTC

arthexis:
08-22-2009 22:24:07 UTC
If you don’t ban me now I promise to annoy you until you have to ban me! :)  <—nvm.  for

Pavitra: Idle

23-08-2009 01:19:02 UTC

for per Wakukee.

redtara: they/themIdle

23-08-2009 01:37:05 UTC

against

arthexis: he/himIdle

23-08-2009 02:55:46 UTC

for I’ll just go idle if it passes, then I can’t be banned, suckers :P

redtara: they/themIdle

23-08-2009 02:57:43 UTC

I’m not sure about that…

arthexis: he/himIdle

23-08-2009 02:58:32 UTC

Explanation: An idle Bill Murray is not a Bill Murray for rule 1.10 Fair Play, which is the only rule that allows players to be banned.

Furthermore, the term “ban” is not even defined in the ruleset. Quaz, you fail at disarming my ploy.

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 03:36:38 UTC

Ah, but Rule 1.10 doesn’t mention the banning of Bill Murrays. It only says “perpetrator,” which you definitely are.

And, you’re right, ban isn’t defined in the Ruleset. Which means we just revert to the normal English definition which is, fortunately, very clear. Although if you complained and started to go all pie-is-square on us, we could just ban you again.

Might be a good idea to vote against this if you actually want to stick around.

arthexis: he/himIdle

23-08-2009 04:53:29 UTC

And spend another dynasty together with you? Never.

arthexis: he/himIdle

23-08-2009 04:56:12 UTC

Explanation: This is not Blognomic anymore, just people doing whatever they want without caring for popular opinion. I’d rather not play any game that accepts your logic as valid.

redtara: they/themIdle

23-08-2009 05:39:19 UTC

@ Me?

Darknight: he/him

23-08-2009 11:13:03 UTC

against Horray for royal clusterfucks.

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 13:06:37 UTC

No one’s forcing you to stay here, arthexis.

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 13:19:13 UTC

Hold on, that doesn’t even make any sense. We use a democratic system, it is literally impossible for people to “do whatever they want without caring for popular opinion.”

Excalabur: Idle

23-08-2009 13:57:31 UTC

*Sigh* 

I seem to have walked into the middle of a fight.

against

I’ll have a proposal up soon to hopefully resolve this situation :)

Klisz: Idle

23-08-2009 14:35:19 UTC

against  against  against  against  against

Bucky: Idle

23-08-2009 14:37:24 UTC

against

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 15:13:34 UTC

Needs one more X to fail.

Qwazukee: Idle

23-08-2009 15:19:03 UTC

Make that 2 more with the revised Weatherteam number.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

23-08-2009 15:30:31 UTC

against

Wakukee: Idle

23-08-2009 16:07:40 UTC

against I will assume that arth was kidding about the annoying until banned part.  against CoV