Sunday, March 07, 2021

Proposal: A little touch up

Self-killed. Failed by Brendan.

Adminned at 08 Mar 2021 18:21:50 UTC

Change

Each Elector may have a Faction, which is publicly tracked and which defaults to “-”, and a Secret Faction, which is secretly tracked by the Doge and which defaults to “-”. An Elector may change either piece of information to any surname on the list of Italian surnames wiki page, either by changing their Faction directly in the tracking document as a Daily Action, or by private messaging the Doge to change their Secret Faction as a Daily Action. Faction and Secret Faction names are flavour text.

A Faction or Secret Faction of “-” is considered to have a no value, and for the purposes of determining whether Electors have the same values for the Factions or Secret Factions a value of “-” is not considered to match other values of “-”.

Each Elector’s Political Power is one higher for each other Elector in the same Secret Faction as themselves. The Doge is responsible for maintaining this modifier as information changes.

to

Each Elector may have a Faction, which is publicly tracked and which defaults to “Factionless”, and a Secret Faction, which is secretly tracked by the Doge and which defaults to “Factionless”. An Elector may change either piece of information to any surname on the list of Italian surnames wiki page, either by changing their Faction directly in the tracking document as a Daily Action, or by private messaging the Doge to change their Secret Faction as a Daily Action. Faction and Secret Faction names are flavour text.

A Faction or Secret Faction of “Factionless” is considered to have a no value, and for the purposes of determining whether Electors have the same values for the Factions or Secret Factions a value of “Factionless” is not considered to match other values of “Factionless”.

Each Elector’s Political Power is one higher for each other Elector in the same Secret Faction as themselves. The Doge is responsible for maintaining this modifier as information changes.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

07-03-2021 16:31:27 UTC

I feel like this just makes stuff more confusing and don’t really see the benefit

Raven1207: he/they

07-03-2021 16:38:27 UTC

It was one of the few things that i could think that could add on to our ruleset since i hard to come up with useful mechanics

Josh: he/they

07-03-2021 17:42:21 UTC

Does this just change the null to a value of Factionless?

If so, eh.  imperial

Kevan: he/him

07-03-2021 17:51:11 UTC

Checking with a side-by-side diff shows that yes, the only effect here is replacing “-” with “Factionless”.

This would break the Arlecchino mask and Confession effects, which still refer to “-”. It also doesn’t update existing values.

against

Josh: he/they

07-03-2021 18:00:40 UTC

Cov against per Kevan

Lulu: she/her

07-03-2021 18:11:12 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

07-03-2021 19:25:04 UTC

against

“-” is a clearer way of indicating someone has no faction than “Factionless”

Raven1207: he/they

07-03-2021 19:25:11 UTC

Ah against