Friday, October 14, 2022

Proposal: A Throne of Pyrite

SK, Madrid

Adminned at 15 Oct 2022 13:14:04 UTC

Create a new rule called “The Golden Party Crown of Destiny” as a subrule to “Carrying”, with:

There exists exactly one or zero of the Golden Party Crown of Destiny, which is an Object. This Object cannot be removed from a Partygoer that is holding it.

As a subrule to that, create a new rule called “Golden Scions of Destiny” with:

Partygoers can be Golden Scions of Destiny and are by default not - this is privately tracked by the Host. If any Golden Scions of Destiny exist and any have Points and any are holding 3 or less Objects, the Host can and shall immediately after the next resolution of a Grand Party, perform the following Atomic Action:
- Randomly select one of the Golden Scions of Destiny which are holding 3 or less Objects.
- Create a Golden Party Crown of Destiny, held by that randomly selected Golden Scion of Destiny
- Set the points of all other Golden Scions of Destiny (if any exist) to 0.
- Make a blog post announcing that a Partygoer now has the Golden Party Crown of Destiny.
- Repeal this subrule of “Golden Scions of Destiny”.

If no Golden Scions of Destiny exist, the Host can and shall repeal the rule “The Golden Party Crown of Destiny” and all of its subrules.

Make all Partygoers who have privately communicated to the Host “IM A GOLDEN SCION” while this Proposal was Pending, into Golden Scions of Destiny.

[LIMITED TIME ONLY!!] I think it would be fun to have a SUPER EXCLUSIVE item that only a single person can have. Be careful though! This is only a limited time offer, and it has its risks! Wow!!! :O

Comments

Bucky:

14-10-2022 13:41:45 UTC

This contradicts the requirement that all Objects except the Ducky have one-word names.

It also steals some of the Ducky’s uniqueness.

Josh: he/they

14-10-2022 14:46:57 UTC

against per Bucky

Habanero:

14-10-2022 16:34:52 UTC

against We already have a duck, that’s more amazing than any golden crown!

Bucky:

14-10-2022 17:01:33 UTC

against per self

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

14-10-2022 17:36:01 UTC

against

Snisbo: she/they

14-10-2022 18:17:19 UTC

against I like the idea of one person getting an advantage at the cost of everyone else who tries, but per above reasons no

Darknight: he/him

15-10-2022 04:05:48 UTC

against

Madrid:

15-10-2022 13:13:37 UTC

against