Saturday, August 13, 2005

Proposal: Abort On Switch

6-1. Reached Quorum (1 Abstention).—Chronos

Adminned at 14 Aug 2005 16:08:46 UTC

WHEREAS, In order to safeguard an orderly and smooth transition of the game during the switch;
Be it enacted, A new rule entitled “An Ultra Uber-Hiatus” containing the text

If the game at blognomic.blogspot.com is won before this dynasty, this dynasty shall be aborted with no winner so that the switch may take place. If this dynasty is won while the game at blognomic.blogspot.com continues, this game shall remain in hiatus until the switch is completed: no Ascension Address may be made.

posted by gazebo_dude at 13 Aug 2005 00:59:45 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Excalabur: Idle

13-08-2005 01:35:28 UTC

Hm.  I may have a counterproposal to this.  But in the meantime,  for

Quazie: Idle

13-08-2005 02:15:47 UTC

for

Cosmologicon: Idle

13-08-2005 02:41:29 UTC

for

Shadowclaw: Idle

13-08-2005 10:24:11 UTC

for

Rodney: Idle

13-08-2005 13:00:10 UTC

against We can at least declare a winner.

Seventy-Fifth Trombone: Idle

13-08-2005 13:43:00 UTC

for

gazebo_dude: Idle

13-08-2005 20:14:49 UTC

I didn’t see the point of declaring a winner since ey wouldn’t be the one doing the Ascension Address, the winner of the main game will be (I assume).

Anyway, if we really want a winner we can amend that clause with the same proposal that gives the victory condition for this dynasty.

Seventy-Fifth Trombone: Idle

13-08-2005 21:14:32 UTC

Absolutely, the main game winner will be giving the Ascension Address.

ChronosPhaenon: Idle

14-08-2005 23:05:17 UTC

imperial