Call for Judgment: Ambiguous DoV
Reaches quorum and passes. Any constitutional crisis is retroactively dispensed with. Josh
Adminned at 01 Jun 2012 08:38:26 UTC
It has come to my attention that the status of my most recent DoV (http://blognomic.com/archive/declaration_of_victory22/) is in dispute, and needs clarification. Therefore, adjust all tracked gamestate information as through the following statements are true:
1)The aforementioned Declaration of Victory was a past dynasty DoV as described in Rule 2.2.3, even if it existed before that rule.
2)The aforementioned Declaration of Victory did not cause a hiatus to begin.
Comments
Bucky:
Murphy:
Yonah:
southpointingchariot:
Klisz:
Josh: HE/HIM
Purplebeard:
Kevan: HE/HIM
[Yonah, south] Voting DEF on a CfJ counts as abstaining rather than deferring.
quirck: HE/HIM
moonroof:
Bucky:
Kevan, the rules appear to have changed to allow DEFs on CfJs.
Kevan: HE/HIM
[Bucky] You can legally cast DEF votes on non-Proposals, but they don’t do anything: “When the Time Buddha has a valid Vote other than VETO on a Proposal, then all votes of DEFERENTIAL are instead…”
Yonah:
Darknight: HE/HIM
welknair: