Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Call for Judgment: Ambiguous DoV

Reaches quorum and passes. Any constitutional crisis is retroactively dispensed with. Josh

Adminned at 01 Jun 2012 08:38:26 UTC

It has come to my attention that the status of my most recent DoV (http://blognomic.com/archive/declaration_of_victory22/) is in dispute, and needs clarification.  Therefore, adjust all tracked gamestate information as through the following statements are true:
1)The aforementioned Declaration of Victory was a past dynasty DoV as described in Rule 2.2.3, even if it existed before that rule.
2)The aforementioned Declaration of Victory did not cause a hiatus to begin.

posted by Bucky at 30 May 2012 22:44:25 UTC Comments (15)

Comments

Bucky:

30-05-2012 22:50:47 UTC

for

Murphy:

30-05-2012 23:05:13 UTC

for

Yonah:

31-05-2012 01:00:21 UTC

imperial

southpointingchariot:

31-05-2012 02:33:43 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

31-05-2012 04:04:01 UTC

for

Josh: Bookie he/they

31-05-2012 06:20:57 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

31-05-2012 07:52:04 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

31-05-2012 09:11:48 UTC

for

[Yonah, south] Voting DEF on a CfJ counts as abstaining rather than deferring.

quirck: he/him

31-05-2012 12:06:48 UTC

for

moonroof:

31-05-2012 14:23:01 UTC

for

Bucky:

31-05-2012 16:50:38 UTC

Kevan, the rules appear to have changed to allow DEFs on CfJs.

Kevan: he/him

31-05-2012 16:53:11 UTC

[Bucky] You can legally cast DEF votes on non-Proposals, but they don’t do anything: “When the Time Buddha has a valid Vote other than VETO on a Proposal, then all votes of DEFERENTIAL are instead…”

Yonah:

31-05-2012 21:55:56 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

01-06-2012 01:09:36 UTC

for

welknair:

01-06-2012 09:44:40 UTC

for