Friday, June 11, 2021

Proposal: [Special Case] Favour tweaking

Timed out and enacted, 4-0. Josh

Adminned at 13 Jun 2021 20:13:54 UTC

In “Favours”:

- Replace “any resource of their choosing that is described only in the Dynastic Rules” with “any Dynastic resource of their choosing”,

- Replace “a single point of any resource of the claiming Vampire Lord’s choosing, so long as it is described only in the Dynastic Rules and the lender has at least one point of that resource to give.” with “a single point of any Dynastic resource of the claiming Vampire Lord’s choosing, so long as the lender has at least one point of that resource to give.”

- Add a paragraph to the end: “For the purposes of this rule, a resource is Dynastic if it is described only in the Dynastic Rules and wiki pages used to track Dynastic gamestate.”

Because I think I should be able to do so, I’d like to head off possible CfJs now that I couldn’t Favour a sigil from Richardo because it is in some way “described” in Zahndorf Crypt as well as the Dynastic rules.

Comments

Janet: she/her

11-06-2021 21:27:20 UTC

Would it be better to just say “if the only Rules that it is described in are Dynastic Rules” to completely eliminate the consideration that other places are described?

lemon: she/her

11-06-2021 22:34:55 UTC

for

pokes:

11-06-2021 22:39:52 UTC

Jason: I do like that better, and it’s snappier, but oh well, I missed the edit window.

Kevan: he/him

12-06-2021 08:28:15 UTC

for I wouldn’t CfJ on the grounds of where it’s “described”, but I think Favours do need reining in a bit if they can make copies of any plausibly countable objects that the game describes. (Does this also let you generate or steal a free Sepulchre, and summon Crypt Denizens at any time?)

Josh: Observer he/they

12-06-2021 09:33:39 UTC

for