Since multiple Beneficial Aspect matches would be possible with this change, you should also replace all instances of “a Beneficial Aspect that matches one of the Features” with “at lease one Beneficial Aspect that matches one of the Features” so that there’s no argument that two matches disqualifies a particular action from taking place.

Not a bad fit. Would maybe flip Astute to Wealth and Menacing to Alliances.

Some of these features already count towards being in Parliament, though, so I’m not sure we necessarily need this.

as this would allow the proposer double up their Astuteness for both Parliamentary access and Influence.

  per Kevan, but we might want other benefits for some of the traits.

Good catch

So you can already double up Menacing, Ambitious *and* Charismatic… but Astueness is a bridge too far?

good jokes

We are where we are. Me, I skipped rolling a second Aspect earlier in the dynasty because there was a good chance that it wouldn’t have been a Beneficial one.

You’re proposing to make both of your Aspects Beneficial for different Resources. I get no benefit from that, and Jonathan and SingularByte get no benefit either (their Astuteness has the same effect as their Ambition).

I mean that is a different discussion from pretending like its about making astuteness special