Tuesday, July 05, 2011

Proposal: Chicken and a fix!

Can’t enact with 12 votes against, without a change of vote. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Jul 2011 01:35:08 UTC

If the Rule “Actions” exists, add to the subrule “Main Actions” at the top the following text:

Actions described in this subrule are Main Actions

If less than the half of EVC of this proposals contain the string “I’m a chicken!”, create a rule called “The Wimps!” with the following text:

When a Gladiator has been Resting without cease for at least seven days and no Gladiator has done so in the last 24 hours, any Gladiator may set the frags of that Gladiator to half of the original value.

 

 

Now it is a proposal, and it comes with a fix for the action rule!

posted by Blacky at 05 Jul 2011 19:45:07 UTC Comments (26)

Comments

Bucky:

05-07-2011 20:23:50 UTC

for  (but without the rider)

SingularByte: he/him

05-07-2011 20:31:25 UTC

for

scshunt:

05-07-2011 20:44:05 UTC

for

BellEt:

05-07-2011 20:52:16 UTC

for

mideg:

05-07-2011 21:14:10 UTC

for

Prince Anduril:

05-07-2011 22:10:11 UTC

against

Bucky:

05-07-2011 23:32:15 UTC

Oopsie, misread the EVC clause.

for “I’m a chicken!” (one of my standing objections with that part of the proposal has not been addressed)

aguydude:

05-07-2011 23:35:15 UTC

against  “I’m a chicken”

aguydude:

05-07-2011 23:35:31 UTC

against  “I’m a chicken!”

Yoda:

05-07-2011 23:45:00 UTC

for

Josh: Mastermind he/they

06-07-2011 06:22:00 UTC

for

Josh: Mastermind he/they

06-07-2011 06:24:47 UTC

against Cov - this turns shoving into a Main Rule, but I preferred it being worth 2AP.

Purplebeard:

06-07-2011 07:23:39 UTC

against

Subrincinator:

06-07-2011 08:02:35 UTC

imperial

mideg:

06-07-2011 11:19:08 UTC

CoV for Chicken-keyword:  for “I’m a chicken!”

Kevan: he/him

06-07-2011 11:28:16 UTC

Note that the “Actions” rule does not exist, as the proposal that would have created it failed. We’re just voting on the EVC.

imperial

Prince Anduril:

06-07-2011 12:11:17 UTC

I just think the rule’s a bit unfair, if someone has to idle because they go on holiday, or something.

Kevan: he/him

06-07-2011 12:16:49 UTC

The rule proposed here does not affect idle players. (A player who idles and comes back a week later has not been “resting without cease”, as they ceased existing as a player for the period in which they were idle.)

Winner:

06-07-2011 12:39:31 UTC

for

ais523: Mastermind

06-07-2011 13:47:32 UTC

against “I’m a chicken”

SingularByte: he/him

06-07-2011 14:00:10 UTC

CoV against “I’m a chicken!”

mideg:

06-07-2011 17:48:15 UTC

@ais and @Singular: You did notice Kevan’s comment, did you not? All there is to this proposal is the EVC-clause, its kind of funny if you vote against (letting the proposal including the EVC fail) but including the clause anyway…

errr, never mind, I just read my mistake…. Ups.

CoV for without chicken reference….

Galtori:

06-07-2011 18:53:28 UTC

imperial
“I’m a chicken!”

scshunt:

06-07-2011 19:03:17 UTC

against “I’m a chicken!”

Darknight: he/him

06-07-2011 23:17:48 UTC

imperial “I’m a chicken”

Bucky:

07-07-2011 05:04:33 UTC

CoV against since the non-rider rule will not exist.