Tuesday, July 03, 2012

Story Post: Citation: Scshunt

After 24 hours, there is a total of 4 Reputation in favour, and 1 against. Scshunt loses one Reputation. Resolved by Kevan.

Adminned at 04 Jul 2012 03:23:38 UTC

I feel that the act of vetoing two proposals, and forcing a fully-working Factory to be immediately demolished with none of its workers being rewarded with a promotion to Foreman is “harmful to goal of making every Machine fixed”. If a majority of Workers consider the consequence of repairing all the Machines to be a bad thing, then they will not be working enthusiastically towards this goal.

posted by Kevan at 03 Jul 2012 09:48:37 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

Purplebeard:

03-07-2012 12:19:08 UTC

[citation needed]

Clucky: he/him

03-07-2012 16:46:46 UTC

for lolol

quirck: he/him

03-07-2012 19:08:30 UTC

for
By the way, Scshunt may vote on this too, right? :)

Josh: Observer he/they

03-07-2012 19:17:33 UTC

Not that it’s particularly important right now, but “If a Worker’s reputation is greater than zero, the worker is considered to be Reputable. If a Worker’s reputation is below zero, the worker is considered to be Mischievous” is weird - it defines states for <0 and >0, but not =0.

moonroof:

03-07-2012 20:23:58 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

03-07-2012 20:35:55 UTC

@Josh a worker with 0 reputation is neither Reputable nor Mischievous. All this means is being non-Reputable is not the same thing as being Mischievous. How is this weird?

omd:

03-07-2012 21:20:11 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

03-07-2012 22:52:09 UTC

*cough* scab *cough* suckup *cough*