The problem with insisting on precision is that a small typo or oversight will make an otherwise valid action entirely illegal.

It also means that if someone messes up a turn and corrects one of the steps, the “blog post” step has to be taken again because the previous post is no longer valid.

The most important decisions should be noted in the comments and history of the great sea anyways.

Ideally yes, but someone could just edit the great sea page with all their bulk changes.

typos are an interesting point. Can we include some phrase like “to the best of their knowledge” that makes it clear you really should do this, but if you make a typo its okay and doesn’t invalidate everything?

we could also try splitting making the summary post from the rest of the action. that way an error in the summary post doesn’t invalidate the action

If you like. We’re usually able to enforce these things by social pressure alone, though; if everyone was giving detailed rundowns and I just posted “eh, did some stuff”, I’d expect disapproval from the group and eventually a “Kevan alone has to list all moves in detail, everyone else is fine” rule if I kept doing it.

COV per Kevan

almost gonna time out so sking to further clear the queue