i think it ought to go the other way around — “Disruption” is much less of a mouthful!

If this gets enacted, and then “Under Their Noses” is subsequently enacted, the word “disruptiveness” will be re-introduced after it has been replaced. I’m not sure if there’s a way to address that.

“Under Their Noses” is only one away from quorum; it can be enacted first as long as one person who greenticks this also greenticks that!

Have done some amends.

God damnit lemon

Agreed, that was a bit rude to lock down any further edits with a vote.

Not rude, tactical: locking in this action as being exempt.

Clever! Slightly annoying!

;~)

Hm, I thought such a tactical move was prohibited under the Fair Play rules, but apparently it isn’t. I didn’t realize that you could weaponize your vote to stop edits to a Proposal during the edit window.

Holding my vote until Bucky votes on https://blognomic.com/archive/under_their_noses