It has enough AGAINST votes that it could not be Enacted without one of those votes being changed.
1-6
-Amnistar
Adminned at 03 Apr 2007 03:24:08 UTC
This proposal makes no change to the ruleset.
No DNA points may be earned from this rule, however, anyone who votes FOR may increase eir complexity by one.
Hopefully someone else will join me in getting 6 of these passes so that we can make complexity a thing of the pasty.
(Trivial) Why didn’t you just vetoed the original proposal, if you didn’t like it?
I was trying to. But I didn’t see the holes with it until recently, when I was reading over the proposals before Amnistar admined them. But then Aminstar beat me to the punch. =P. But because I cannot see anyone getting higher than say, 6 in any evolutionary variable, it is very easy to counter complexity by simply getting everyone to 10 or so complexity extra fast.
And if this was trivial, we couldn’t get free complexity, Which would defeat the purpose. =P
Yeah, I’m trying to address any loopholes. Also, if you want to fiddle around with the mechanism, I’m up for that as well. But really, I don’t intend for Complexity to be a hard limit (that is, I think it should increase faster than we need, at least after a few more proposals get through).
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Amnistar: he/him