Monday, April 29, 2024

Proposal: Giving the Nod

Reached quorum 8 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 01 May 2024 09:09:46 UTC

To the first paragraph of “Distribution”, add:-

Where a Thief says in a comment on a Haul post that they “agree” with another Thief, and offers no distribution in the same comment, this is taken as a suggested distribution that matches the Proposition of the named Thief for that Haul, at the time of the comment (if such a Proposition exists).

A clear shortcut for endorsing another Thief’s proposition, to make agreed duplicates more distinct from subtle counter-suggestions.

Comments

Josh: he/they

29-04-2024 13:49:27 UTC

Does an ‘agree’ post clearly act as a proposition in its own right, thus cancelling it’s poster’s own previous proposition?

Kevan: City he/him

29-04-2024 13:58:27 UTC

I think it’s looped up okay; an “agree” statement is “taken as a suggested distribution” here, and from the existing rule “a comment that includes a single suggested distribution” is a Proposition.

Clucky: he/him

29-04-2024 17:45:51 UTC

What if I say I agree with both Josh and JonathanDark, but they have different proposed distributions?

Kevan: City he/him

29-04-2024 17:49:55 UTC

It’d be equivalent to you just typing out those two distributions in full in the same comment, if I’ve written this right - which wouldn’t count as a valid proposition from you because your comment doesn’t include a “single” suggested distribution.

Clucky: he/him

29-04-2024 18:14:42 UTC

okay yeah that makes sense for

Josh: he/they

29-04-2024 18:15:07 UTC

for

4st:

29-04-2024 18:33:43 UTC

for

NadNavillus: he/him

29-04-2024 19:42:00 UTC

for

Juniper.ohyegods: she/her

29-04-2024 20:50:11 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

29-04-2024 21:54:55 UTC

for

Desertfrog:

30-04-2024 05:34:09 UTC

for