Friday, October 09, 2015

Proposal: I could snap Conclaves like a twig.

3 cardinals are not voting AGAINST. Failed by Elias IX.

Adminned at 10 Oct 2015 09:19:27 UTC

Add a rule, Tick Tock:

If there are no unresolved Conclaves, replace:

If a Cardinal has posted a comment on a Conclave which consists of the single phrase “I elect as Supreme Pontiff X.”, where X is the name of a Cardinal other than themselves, and has posted no other comments of that format on that Conclave, then the comment is considered to be that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave, electing the named Cardinal.

With:

If a Cardinal has posted a comment on a Conclave which consists of the single phrase “I elect as Supreme Pontiff X.”, where X is the name of a Cardinal other than themselves, then that comment is considered to be that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave, electing the named Cardinal. If a Cardinal has posted more than one such comment on a Conclave, only their last such comment is that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave

If a Quorum of EVCs on this Proposal include the phrase “proficitis cum ea”, less quotes, instead replace:

If a Cardinal has posted a comment on a Conclave which consists of the single phrase “I elect as Supreme Pontiff X.”, where X is the name of a Cardinal other than themselves, and has posted no other comments of that format on that Conclave, then the comment is considered to be that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave, electing the named Cardinal.

With:

If a Cardinal has posted a comment on a Conclave which consists of the single phrase “I elect as Supreme Pontiff X.”, where X is the name of a Cardinal other than themselves, then that comment is considered to be that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave, electing the named Cardinal. If a Cardinal has posted more than one such comment on a Conclave, only their last such comment is that Cardinal’s Ballot for that Conclave

That’s “get on with it”, by the way.

Comments

Thrawn:

10-09-2015 06:14:07 UTC

for
proficitis cum ea

Josh:

10-09-2015 06:30:10 UTC

against For the EVC rider, and the ambiguity of the non-EVC version, which seems to set up an automagical effect without specifying who would carry it out.

Brendan:

10-09-2015 06:53:14 UTC

imperial This is hard to read.

Roberto:

10-09-2015 07:20:53 UTC

imperial

Kevan:

10-09-2015 07:32:28 UTC

against One-vote-per-comment is easier to count and feels more in keeping with the theme.

Purplebeard:

10-09-2015 09:10:29 UTC

against

Thrawn:

10-09-2015 10:41:14 UTC

Thats true, there can always be another conclave
against

ayesdeeef:

10-09-2015 13:11:57 UTC

imperial

Darknight:

10-09-2015 20:02:46 UTC

against

Elias IX:

10-10-2015 09:00:42 UTC

imperial