From my general perspective that there’s historical value in dynasties ending with a few stubs and dead ends in their ruleset. We should move on, but we shouldn’t airbrush too much of this out.

It’s a philosophical difference, at this point, but I don’t think we should treat it as a scar. It’s a thing that happened, not a shameful secret that lives in the dark.

I do worry that this could blur into becoming “the group voted to permanently bar a player from the game” in the longer folk memory, particularly among regular players who weren’t present this dynasty, if we’re too cautious about discussing or recording the steps that led up to it.

My personal motivation on this proposal was general rule tidiness, not trying to whitewash the past.

For what it’s worth, I added both of the posts regarding idling Raven and renaming their account to the Posts of Interest section of this dynasty’s wiki page, so that we will have an obvious record pointing to the incident.

If anyone feels like more context is needed, please feel free to edit.